liz_marcs: Liberty and Justice in a lesbian kiss (liberty_justice_otp)
liz_marcs ([personal profile] liz_marcs) wrote2008-01-20 12:27 pm

You did not just go there...

I should just not read metafandom on LJ and meta_roundup on IJ some days.

Because when I see posts like this where fanfiction is compared to "gay marriage," I want to break things. (The correct term is equality marriage, BTW. Edit: I've been told that "gay marriage" and "same-sex marriage" are as acceptable as "equality marriage." Just throwing that out there so it doesn't detract from my point.)

[NOTE: DO NOT go over and flame the OP or cause her problems. I'm providing the link so you can read the post and for no other reason.]

I first heard/seen it on LJ a few days ago. Then I saw it linked to on JF. It's now been linked to meta_roundup on IJ.

I've seen this same comparison three times in something like three days.

Each time I read it, I get a bit angrier.

Look, I understand that the Organization for Transformative Works (hereafter referred to as the OTW) is a big deal to some people. I've read the various arguments in support of it, and I'm still not horribly impressed. I see a lot of biiiiiiig words arguing why I should think the OTW (whatever it's supposed to be) is the greatest thing evah, but what I don't see is a lot of operational details that a wonk like me sees as remotely feasible.

Personally, when it comes to the OTW, I say the jury is waaaaay out on that one. Because all those words I'm reading really don't tell me a damn thing of what it's actually supposed to be and what it's supposed to accomplish. I feel a bit like someone who's listening to 5 blind men describe an elephant without knowing that they're describing an elephant. No one seems to actually agree on what "it" is supposed to be.

But far be it from me to harsh anyone's Big Idea That Will Change the World. Knock yourself out, sez I. Who knows? Maybe I'm too naturally suspicious of the Big Idea That Will Change the World. Maybe the supporters of OTW are right. Maybe it will actually turn out to be something pretty special. I could be wrong, and I'm willing to be wrong.

However, based on what I'm reading/seeing so far...let's just say I have my doubts about OTW and leave it at that.

That said, posts like "fanfiction is like gay marriage" is not going to win me over.

In fact, it really pisses me the hell off.

As someone who lives in the only state in the U.S. that actually recognizes equality marriage as a matter of law and who lived the 4 bruising years between 2003 and 2007 where the fight raged non-stop over any and all attempts to amend our state constitution to make our gay and lesbian friends, family members, and neighbors into second class citizens to the point where it overrode all other state issues I'm pretty fucking sure that fanfiction is not like "gay marriage" at all.

Let me explain something:

  • No one has ever been beaten into the hospital or the morgue because they wrote fanfiction

  • No one has ever found themselves put out on the street because their fanfic writing partner died and their writing partner's family didn't want that dirty little co-writer around

  • No one has ever been prevented from attending their fanfic writing partner's funeral by members of their fanfic writing partner's family who were fanficphobic

  • No one has ever been prevented from seeing their fanfic writing partner in the hospital because they wrote fanfic

  • No one has ever been treated as a second class citizen by society at large because they wrote fanfic

  • No one is arguing about making amending the U.S. Constitution to make fanfic illegal, thereby relegating you to permanent second-class citizenship because of your hobby (as opposed to, y'know, your very existence)

  • No one has ever had their civil rights violated because they wrote fanfic


I'm sure that list could be a lot longer, but that's just for a start on how writing fanfic is not at all like "gay marriage."

Listen, I'm not saying that fanfic writers haven't found themselves in shit RL situations like the ones I've listed above. I'm also not arguing that all fanfic writers are gay, lesbian, or bi any more than I'd argue the reverse.

However, 99% of the time verging on 100% of the time, when RL (as in: not on the Internet) sexism or racism or sexuality bias rears its ugly head and slaps an individual across the face, it's not because they write fanfiction. They may happen to write fanfiction, but it's not because they write fanfiction, damn it!

You see the difference, right? Because I see a pretty big difference between the two.

Listen, I understand that the very idea of the OTW inspires fanatical devotion among some in fandom to the point where they can be pretty annoying about it, but posts like this are not helping your cause.

And this isn't the first time I've seen/read posts in favor of the OTW that lacked any sort of perspective at all. I mean, for the record, writing fanfiction is not at all like being in an interracial marriage. And questioning the purpose of the OTW is not at all like being homophobic or racist (examples of arguments I've actually read).

Posts like this piss people off. It sure as hell pisses me off. And when you piss people off, you turn them off. Maybe permanently.

Hyperbole is no one's friend. Please keep that in mind for the future. Thanx.
ext_6368: cherry blossoms on a tree -- with my fandom name "EntreNous" on it (Default)

[identity profile] entrenous88.livejournal.com 2008-01-21 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm forever stunned by the callousness of fans who claim that just reading fanfic/writing fanfic/writing slash = oppression on the level of gay, lesbian, and trans peoples who are threatened physically, made second-class citizens legislatively, and made to be open to countless and continual challenges to their right to just work and live in the same professions/communities as everyone else.

This case seems...even more bothersome than the typical craven thoughtlessness that pops up on a regular basis (ex: someone claiming that any comments challenging the substantive value of a meme -- a meme which requires viewers to agree that they're against prejudice explicitly or be thought prejudiced regardless of any other evidence -- makes the poster of said meme suffer like Matthew Shepherd -- remember that lackwittery?).

Because from what I'm getting reading the comments to this entry, the original poster of this argument was more looking to say something provocative, and is more intrigued by the idea of gaining excessive attention than to making a persuasive -- or even just a rational -- argument. I am at a loss to find any value in such a strategy, besides that of alienating people -- if that's the goal, then I think it's certainly been achieved.

To me this is an example of people in privileged positions making the case that they should be allowed to co-opt the oppressed status of people who are not privileged (i.e., wanting to claim actual suffering for arguments of portioning out of recompense and/or gaining the designation of seriousness for their claims, and/or simply receiving heightened attention of audiences) by people in privileged positions. And before someone gets on my ass about this -- I have NO IDEA if the OP is actual LGBT, but that is not of issue here -- the OP's argument strives to lend that sort of false credibility of suffering and genuine experience of prejudice to anyone simply because they write fanfiction, regardless of their status as heteronormative or queer to any degree.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2008-01-23 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Hi! I'm drowning!

Have I mentioned that I'm busy trying to hide at work and play with my new cell phone? Because I totally am.

I just wanted to *wave hello* and weep quietly.

Funny enough, it appears the [livejournal.com profile] elfweck is not alone in believing that the argument is a good one. There are a couple, in fact and I'm...

Okay, I really don't know many times I can say the same thing.

Have I mentioned that there appears to be one person right now arguing that, ummmm, dismissing [livejournal.com profile] elfweck's point is using the same tactics that people use to deprive GLBT people of their civil rights? Because there is. I think. I keep reading it over and over again, and that's pretty what I keep coming up with.

I have to shut off the computer again, because the boggling is hurting my head.

I'm not sure how many times I can say "inappropriate comparison that trivializes your argument" before I start breaking my fingers from pounding on the keyboard so hard out of frustration.

ext_6368: cherry blossoms on a tree -- with my fandom name "EntreNous" on it (Default)

[identity profile] entrenous88.livejournal.com 2008-01-23 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
HI! I'm glad you had a second to say hello -- I imagine you're swamped with replies.

That does not surprise me, unfortunately, though I still find the opportunism of such an argument shocking. It boggles the mind that people can be so self-interested as to feel comparing discomfort over making a poor argument is akin to suffering oppression. Wow. Major fail.

You know, you don't have to keep repeating your good arguments to people reiterating fallacies. You've already stated your case admirably, so if you need to take a break, take it! If you feel like you have to reply, link them to where you've already articulated your thoughts on this.

*sneaks you some really good thai food for lunch*