A Lesson in Discrimination...
Well, I'll be damned.
When I was in sixth grade, my homeroom/religon teacher separated my class into blue-eyed people and everyone else. She then proceeded to treat my blue-eyed classmates better than the rest of us. This being a Lithuanian Catholic school, more than half-the class had blue eyes.
By the end of the class, us non-blue-eyeds were angry, resentful, and acting out, while the blue-eyed kids started...well...lording it over us because we couldn't breathe without getting nailed but they could get away with all kinds of shit short of violence.
Then, at the end of the class the purpose was made clear: it was to give every single one of us an object lesson about prejudice, which just so happened to be the subject we'd tackle in religion class the following day (remember: Catholic school). Us non-blue-eyed kids were relieved. The blue-eyed kids were ashamed.
And oh, yeah, blue-eyed kids that acted like dicks? They were punished like you wouldn't believe. When they protested, the teacher kindly pointed out that they knew what they did was wrong and against the rules, but they did it anyway once they thought they could get away with it.
Years later, that lesson stayed with me.
Here's what I didn't know: It was based on an exercise that a third-grade teacher in an all-white Iowa town did in 1968.
Much thanks to
jennem for the link. For years I've always wondered where my diabolically genius religion teacher got the idea.
Remember kids: The big problem with Catholic schools is that they make you think, even when you don't particularly want to.
When I was in sixth grade, my homeroom/religon teacher separated my class into blue-eyed people and everyone else. She then proceeded to treat my blue-eyed classmates better than the rest of us. This being a Lithuanian Catholic school, more than half-the class had blue eyes.
By the end of the class, us non-blue-eyeds were angry, resentful, and acting out, while the blue-eyed kids started...well...lording it over us because we couldn't breathe without getting nailed but they could get away with all kinds of shit short of violence.
Then, at the end of the class the purpose was made clear: it was to give every single one of us an object lesson about prejudice, which just so happened to be the subject we'd tackle in religion class the following day (remember: Catholic school). Us non-blue-eyed kids were relieved. The blue-eyed kids were ashamed.
And oh, yeah, blue-eyed kids that acted like dicks? They were punished like you wouldn't believe. When they protested, the teacher kindly pointed out that they knew what they did was wrong and against the rules, but they did it anyway once they thought they could get away with it.
Years later, that lesson stayed with me.
Here's what I didn't know: It was based on an exercise that a third-grade teacher in an all-white Iowa town did in 1968.
Much thanks to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Remember kids: The big problem with Catholic schools is that they make you think, even when you don't particularly want to.
no subject
She was a brave lady; I followed the link and read about the backlash she suffered.
no subject
But it really is an object lesson that you just don't ever forget.
But, yeah, the original teacher was very, very brave...especially considering the timing of when she started the class.
no subject
Thanks for the link - I'd never heard of it, either.
no subject
It seems like such a deceptively simply concept, but even in the hour or so I had to live with it, it turns out to be fairly complex. I can't imagine doing it over the course of a few days, as this teacher did. And in 1968, no less!
no subject
I remember in the first grade there being a "whites only" fountain in my 100 year old elementary school building. The sign hadn't come down, and the attitude hadn't changed.
I remember that same year seeing an Indian couple be turned away from seeing Superman at the theater because they didn't have their "get off the Rez" passes.
Made a strong impression on my little mind, I'll tell you what.
no subject
no subject
Believe me...a taste is really all I needed.
no subject
no subject
Frankly, when it came to history, literature, civics, life sciences it couldn't be beat. Unfortunately, my school tended to not be as strong in maths and some of the harder sciences (i.e., physics, chemistry).
That said...I can't deny that I got one hell of an education out of it.
As for Catholic schools, I think it almost depends on the diocese you're in and the bishop who's heading it up before you can make a judgment about the Catholic schools in that area. Given the state of the Catholic church these days *handwaves* I'd think long and hard about it.
no subject
no subject
I feel somewhat dumb that I didn't know.
I can attested from first-hand experience that her lessons even in sorely truncated form, are very effective.
no subject
She did the exercise in Australia - and I wish there was some way of getting a copy of the documentary that was made for that, because it was highly charged and emotional. Adults being confronted with their latent racism is hard to watch.
no subject
no subject
There was a similar social experiment out in California in 1967. It was supposed to teach about fascism, and it went awry.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1510/is_/ai_13805356
There's a novelized account of the experiment also.
http://www.amazon.com/Wave-Todd-Strasser/dp/0440993717/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1222728947&sr=1-1
no subject
no subject
I attended Catholic school as well, though we didn't have any such exercises. Too bad. I did get a superior education to what I would've gotten in public school, though.
I followed the link and read a bit about it. It says a lot about our psychological make-up and our desire for approval and belonging.
no subject
There were, when I was a kid, two Catholic high schools in town- St. Martin's Prep and St. Placid's Academy (one of my cousins was in the last class to graduate St. Placid's) and then for a while there was just a primary school at St. Michaels. The public schools get lazy when there's no private schools close enough to give them competition.
Julia, thinking is a good thing.
no subject
Of course, everything is different in NYC, but the private schools, including the extremely expensive prep schools tried their hardest to keep up with us. They didn't have a prayer of doing so. NYC has some of the worst public schools in the country I suspect, but the elite public schools give you a better education than anywhere else in the country.
no subject
Problem with it was, it was used for a forum on RACE. Which. Sure. If you have a room of all-white kids, maybe you do have to play a trick of blue-eyed versus other-types-of-eyes people. But when you're in an incredibly diverse university? No.
Eventually someone got through to the administration, though, and they don't show that as their opener-to-the-race-conversation gambit anymore. \o/
no subject
We did an entire unit of sociological experimentation and the sort of object lessons like the racism demonstration that you describe above in my sociology class -- and yet another in my psychology class, the following year. On the one hand, they are very effective in getting the concepts across to the students. On the other, they're rather questionable ethically, considering the potential for long term trauma in the children.
Another one you might be interested in, and I need to sit down and figure out where exactly this sucker took place and find some documentation on it again, but I don't have time right at this instant, was an experiment done on the college level, looking into prison structures and the roles of prisoners and guards, in which volunteers were placed in a mock prison in the basement of a college dorm. And there's the experiment that was done in part to determine how it was that Nazi soldiers who claimed to have been otherwise moral people could have followed the orders they were given in the war. . . . If you're interested, I could probably track down that one, as well.
But, yeah, again, excellent object lesson, but actually rather dangerous psychologically. Which should really just tell us how incredibly dangerous, psychologically, the perpetuation of racism is for real. . . .
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's an experience I still have not forgotten.
no subject
Of course it was the Government teacher that went the farthest -- especially when he noticed that the kids that did the reading were all randomly selected for the minority group. He had us sit in the back, divided by three row from the rest of the class and completely ignored us during his class. Of course equally as predictably, I organized my minority group members into a staged movement to all move to the front and sit at his feet for the final 10 minutes of class. I think he was rather pleased, or at least that's how I interpreted his looking at me and laughing while shaking his head.
Also interesting was the final few teachers who reversed the discrimination after everyone had gotten used to who was going to be treated how...
no subject
I may have gone to my home room teacher about the "Nazi Teacher" but was told to go back to class. *sigh*no subject
It's obvious that the dark-eyed students would more likely be African-Americans and this made the exercise too heavy-handed to me. Instead, I was going to give everyone a number, but there would also be a shape to go with the number and a color code. The number and the shape would be irrelevant; it's the color that would determine who got the good stuff. The seeming randomness of it would, I think, drive home the point better that differentiating like that is just stupid.
As an added bonus, I was going to take any left-handed person from the "oppressed" group and put them in with the "privileged" group. These would be the "exceptional" people that are given perks, like the minority sports stars that racists "don't mind."
no subject
no subject
no subject
It was scarily effective at changing people's behavior, and was really distressing, though oddly I can't even recall which group I was in.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I always thought it was kind of mean, but an interesting idea. It's probably the best way to reach kids growing up in an almost all-white, all-Christian environment where prejudice seems like a foreign and invisible thing.
no subject
no subject
no subject