Oh, I knew that at the time. I was simply testy because of something else I was doing and because I was tiring of her gamesmanship. Shouldn't have let my testiness show, though.

You know, it strikes me that if she had framed her viewpoint a little differently, none of this would likely have happened. For example, explaining her apparently religious conflation of creativity and sexuality first, and then expanding her discussion to show how it related, at least in her mind, to the issue of gay marriage, would have made all the difference in how people perceived what she was saying. But that, I suspect, was never the goal.