I was using YOUR example. *I* am not posting any such links, nor do I have any interest in doing so. Just to be clear.
Does the context matter? So far, in their responses on this issue, LJ has not indicated that context is important to them, merely the presence of a link to something they find objectionable.
It could very well be posted by someone horrified at the fact that there is a site on the web that instructs on making these devices. Maybe they're making an f'locked post and trust no one who is on that reading list is in any way inclined to make harmful explosive devices, but they include the link so others can see for themselves that the site does indeed exist and they're not making it up.
Still, that may well be irrelevant to LJ's decision-making process. They have said f'locking makes no difference and have not yet indicated an interest in context.
no subject
I was using YOUR example. *I* am not posting any such links, nor do I have any interest in doing so. Just to be clear.
Does the context matter? So far, in their responses on this issue, LJ has not indicated that context is important to them, merely the presence of a link to something they find objectionable.
It could very well be posted by someone horrified at the fact that there is a site on the web that instructs on making these devices. Maybe they're making an f'locked post and trust no one who is on that reading list is in any way inclined to make harmful explosive devices, but they include the link so others can see for themselves that the site does indeed exist and they're not making it up.
Still, that may well be irrelevant to LJ's decision-making process. They have said f'locking makes no difference and have not yet indicated an interest in context.