liz_marcs: Jeff and Annie in Trobed's bathroom during Remedial Chaos Theory (Buffy_Giles_blah_blah_blah)
liz_marcs ([personal profile] liz_marcs) wrote2006-09-04 07:49 pm

*snicker*

ETA: WHEEEEE! I've been suspended from TWoP completely. I can't even view the message boards!

It appears that I've been turned into the TWoP Traffic Court for being unduly snotty in the BtVS fanfic thread.

Ummmm, so snotty is bad now? Guess it's been awhile since I posted something snotty on TwOP, hunh?

I went over to pimp the Dark Xander Fic-A-Thon for people who might be interested and ended up poking my nose in an exchange.

There's a certain member there who makes a habit of recommending Spike-centric fics (perfectly and totally okay) that tend to bash male non-Spike characters (which kind of isn't). A few people have called her on recc'ing bash fics (including me) in the past, but she keeps going in that direction.

I think it's a case of it getting on my last nerve.

I admit this: Spike isn't my favorite character in the Buffy-verse. That said, he's not the one I dislike the most. He once held the number two spot (number one has always been reserved for Dawn since the first third of S6...please don't shoot me), but he's moved down the dislike ladder since then.

However, I get why Spike's the number one fave for people. I understand it. It all comes down to what character appeals to/speaks to you.

I read Spike-centric fanfic. I enjoy some of it. But I enjoy Spike-centric fanfic that doesn't turn Spike into St. Cheekbones of the Abs and acknowledges that Spike has Issues, like every other flipping character on Angel and Buffy. I enjoy Spike-centric fanfic that doesn't take a crudgel to the other characters, or plays down the legitimate feelings of and between other characters just so he can look better by comparison.

Look, I'm not sure how many times BtVS felt they had to harp on this, but Spike without a soul is substansively different that Spike with a soul. The failure was in the writing in that they kept telling us that Spike was different, but failed to actually show it. What's more, they knew they were failing to show it because otherwise Buffy wouldn't have been caterwauling about Spike having a soul every five minutes.

However, in stating the fact that Spike with soul is a different person than Spike without a soul, they most certainly weren't breaking canon on that front. They were being amazingly consistent, which is nothing short of a miracle in S7.

What's good for the Angel, is good for the Spike says I.

Also, upon watching some episodes from Angel and Buffy, I've also come to the solid conclusion that comparing Angel to Spike isn't entirely fair as far as resouling and how they acted thereafter goes. Nor do I think it says that Angel was "better" than Spike or that Spike was "better" than Angel.

For a start, before Angelus got slammed with a soul, no one knew it was possible to shove a soul into a vampire. So even if Angelus was inclined to go get one (and he wasn't), Angelus wouldn't even know where to go. The tripwire was incredibly vague as well. "Happiness" that was strong enough to allow Angel to forget that he was a vampire loses Angel the soul, but no one seemed to know what would give him that level of happiness.

Furthermore, once Angel becomes Angel, he had zero by way of support network. All he had really was Darla, Dru, and Spike, not exactly the most sympathetic creatures to his plight. He also stuck with what he knew, but picked his victims more carefully (criminals and scum, as Darla points out). In short, Angel had no one to rely on at all.

By the time Spike comes around, it's general knowledge that getting a soul is possible. (I'm leaving aside the chip out vs. get a soul argument in this debate...I say chip out and stand by it; other people argue on the other side). Not only that, Spike had a support network once he got it. Buffy — at least partially driven by her Angel issues — backed and supported Spike. The Scoobs, to varying degrees, fell in line for the most part.

But falling back into signature Spike-yness? Maybe understandable given my own re-watch of some Angel episodes. There needed, I think, to be more "clues" that Spike was substansively different with soul than without. The "not eating people" factor doesn't hold as much power here, mostly because we had spent the three years previous with Spike on a mostly human-free diet.

I suppose nothing short of substantial interactions with Scoobs not named Buffy or showing Spike more in isolation from Buffy after the initial episodes would have managed that trick. I think that's where the missed opportunity really was.

Having said all that, Spike without the soul (just like Angelus before him) was an utter bastard. Whitewashing him and making the Scoobs look bad by comparison in fanfic...that just rubs the wrong way.

How hard is this: If you don't like the character, do your readers a favor and metaphorically send them out of town on a bus. Please. While there's an audience for character-bashing fics, there's a bigger audience that hates them.

ETA: Watching the big NB and CC reunion movie. Heh. Is it me, or are none of the characters at all likeable. The only person I feel bad for thus far is CC's character, because she's about to be shit on by the "poor picked on good guy we're supposed to be sympathizing with."

Bleh.

[identity profile] -normal-girl-.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
So does this mean you won't be reading my 42 part fic Spike/Dawn fic? ;)

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
I think when we friended each other, you were pretty deep into it already. :-)

Plus, I think I was in the middle of Facing the Heart in Darkness.

Honestly though, I have read fics that feature Dawn and Spike seperately and together (altough none so far in a 'ship).

(no subject)

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com - 2006-09-05 04:26 (UTC) - Expand

Using my only Buffy icon

[identity profile] charliesmum.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes I think the biggest problem with the Angel vs Spike thing is that whoever ultimately wrote for Spike was in love with James Marsters, and gave him a lot of good things to work with.

We are told initally that vampires are demons that took over someone's body, really, and who that person was is essentially gone. The demon remembers the human past, but not the emotions or the love. Remember when Xander's friend was turned in the first episode? He said to Xander that he was like a shadow to him now.

So Angel with a soul is who he was as a human; sort of tortured and maybe a bit selfish, but a good guy. Spike, on the other hand, started doing 'good', albeit for selfish reasons, way before he got his soul.

As much as I love Spike, and really enjoyed Chip Spike, I do think this is a bit of an inconsistancy. I think they started making Spike more human way before they should've. It made Angel/Angelus make no sense.

The other thing that totally bugs me about Angel is this. Why is sex the trigger? I mean, sex is nice and all, but I don't see how it equals total happiness. Pleasure, yeah, happiness? Not so much.

There was this scene in Angel, after Connor was born, and he and Cordelia were lying in bed with the baby between them, all three sleeping, and for a moment, all was peaceful. To me, that's a moment of perfect happiness. Just being in love with Buffy, or knowing she loved him should've been perfect happiness. The whole sex thing really, really annoyed me.

Which, I realise, is completely off the subject now, so I'll shut up.

Re: Using my only Buffy icon

[identity profile] a2zmom.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
IMO, sex is not why Angel lost his soul. If it was, he would have lost it at the point of orgasm. Which would been lol funny, but that's not what happened. He lost it hours later, in the afterglow, so to speak.

Why? Becuase he got what he most wanted - he thought he was redeemed. Here is this girl, who in Angel's eyes is perfect and she loves him and trust him completely. Trusts him so much that she gives him herself. And in that instant, he forgets his sins, he thinks he's a man because he's a man in her eyes.

Of course, the horrible irony is, instead of being redeemed, he condems himself back to hell (literally, eventually.)

As far as vampires, again imo, they totally retain their human personality minus compassion and morals, with a demon tilting toward active violence. I've done a few posts on the susbject, if you're interested, here they are:

Angel vs Angelus

Angel, Spike, Vampirism and Redemption

Spike, Fanfic and Me

[identity profile] saturn-girl.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Curious, I checked out TWOP and I really don't think your post was any "snottier" than what normally goes on in those forums. Shame on my fellow Legionnaire for being such a tattle tale narc!

As for bashy fic, I think you already know my stance.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
And we got bashed for it in return. Can you believe she won a monthly plaque for that? Holy shit.

Anyway, temporarily suspended I am. For the crime of snottiness. *rolls eyes* Weeeeird.

(no subject)

[identity profile] saturn-girl.livejournal.com - 2006-09-05 05:12 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] hilleviw.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
I know nothing about the BtVS world - saw the movie, but have never watched any of the telly show. TWoP, however, has been gaining a reputation for rigidity about commenting and threading, and playing favorites in some nasty ways. Several discussions I periodically participate in have migrated away from there. If you got a wrist slap from TWoP, you're in excellent company.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
*snicker*

Slap on the wrist? I totally got suspended until September 7. I can't log in or out. It's pretty funny, in a way. I've received no email from the mods telling me that I was suspended. I found out when I went back to check the boards. I figured it was my sarcastic post and went to Forum Traffic Court. Lo and behold, there was the complaint. It's since been altered by Sars to say that it's been "handled."

[identity profile] nwhepcat.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Sheesh, you got warned for that?!

And yeah, I'm watching, and this is a nightmarish clan. April, I find, is sympathetic, but she's set up that way by the writers, is the only real reason.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Warned? Try suspended. I'm pretty surprised myself. Warning I figured. But the temporary spork? Talk about overreaction, especially considering that it the post itself hasn't been edited at all.

As for the movie, I can honestly say that the writing suckethed the big one. Talk about whiplash characterization. The acting was much better than the material. I mean, NB played his hateful smarmy character pretty well. CC sparkled on screen. And CG is always such a woobie.

Still hated all the characters when the credits rolled, though. Were we supposed to be charmed that they all buried the hatchet by the end? I was not charmed. No matter how you sliced it, Dil still left his fiance in the woods with a bear and what's more, he knew she'd be messing with the bear. And the girl he actually got? Not much better. In her shoes, I would have reacted like the babysitter character in the shower scene. Bah.

I got your email and I just am dropping a line to say I agree (about exposition). I'm planning to move some of that to a different scene (I hope) and rearrange a few others. As for the Holy Shit element...*cringe*...it got just a little bit worse.

[identity profile] nocturnalista.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
Holy moley, I would have said much worst than you. That's why I avoid TWoP for the most part these days. The Xander thread has become the Why-Xander-Is-The-Worst-Guy-Ever thread.

I never saw any change from Chipped Spike to Souled Spike. That was just another example of the really poor storytelling in the final two seasons.

I'm still ambivalent towards the NB/CC movie. It sounds horrid, but it would be fun to see those two interact again.

[identity profile] huzzlewhat.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
You got officially reprimanded for that? Damn. I'm so glad I've never given in to my various impulses to delurk there. I followed that link earlier today, and only got as far as the "Oh, so you're a racist!" line before giving up in shuddering disgust. Nothing gets me unreasonably angry faster than that argument — that disliking vampires is being "racist." Because yeah. Bloodthirsty soulless killers who think of the nice, wholesome American children as food = black people. That's a great comparison.

Watching the big NB and CC reunion movie. Heh. Is it me, or are none of the characters at all likeable.

Not just you. Everyone was horrible. Which, to be fair, I think they were supposed to be. Even the "poor picked-on good guy" was an ass.

[identity profile] invisionary.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Because yeah. Bloodthirsty soulless killers who think of the nice, wholesome American children as food = black people. That's a great comparison.

That's one of a few fannish arguments that just totally drives me up the wall. Do these people even think about what they're saying? Good lord.

(no subject)

[identity profile] mbbthebest.livejournal.com - 2006-09-08 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] skipp-of-ark.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
I know I'm being massively hypocritical about this, but people who can't get past their own personal political agendas and/or interpretations and acknowledge that Joss and ME were not operating from the same political page as they were are frustrating in the extreme. It's one thing for individual audience members to come to the conclusion that vampires and other demons were metaphors for other races and cultures besides the Big Bad Oppressive Ebol Straight White Men who destroy everything they touch, yada yada yada. (Given stuff like Anne Rice's Lestat novels and RPGs about different "tribes" of vampires, it's somewhat understandable that at least some folks came to the show with that kind of perception of vampires.) It's another thing when they refuse to acknowledge that ME's vastly different approach to vampires and demons was just as legitimate a take as theirs, or when they bitterly insist that their "vampires=other races" is the only mature tack that ME could have taken. Yeah, I admit I wish ME had done things differently, but I'll admit that Joss was perfectly in his right as head writer and executive producer to decide how to treat vampires and demons as metaphors or not. (I just wish he'd done it in a more consistent manner, but that's just my opinion.)

(Anonymous) 2006-09-05 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
The whole human/vampire/ensouled vampire thing always interested me. Starting with an in-depth look at Angel (being the most obvious) through all his various incarnations.

Liam as a human seemed to have many many issues. My own personal take on the situation was that he was an artist, that didn't live in a family/society that encouraged that side of him. As a result he rebelled and did just about everything that could disappoint his father.

Now after he's been turned and become Angelus, he's still got that rage and his first action is to wipe out everyone he may have had contact with. But then later on we still see evidence of that artistic side of him, but now it's very twisted. Think about the vampires he sired (least two of the ones we know about), Penn and Drusilla; think about how he treated Holtz and others. He attempted to shape Penn into a carbon copy of himself, and then he tortured Drusilla in every way he could think of to ensure that she was completely broken before he finally turned her - in my opinion, this was his new way of creating something, to his twisted vampire pysche, this was his art. With Holtz, he was always playing games, toying with the fabled demon-hunter - who knows what he might have originally had planned before he got a soul/Holtz was recruited by Sahjhan (unsure of precise timeline as to which happened first); that same behaviour was shown when he goes up against Buffy in BTVS season 2 or his own gang in seasons of AtS - he refuses to simply kill them and move on, playing games/torturing them, basically seeing what he can turn them into (possibly without having to actually turn them - we'll never know, the plans/stories never got to go that far before his soul-retention issue became resolved), this is all he now 'lives' for.

Then after he gets ensouled for the first time, he tries to hide out amongst the only family he's known for centuries but they don't accept him. From then on it seems that he hides that artistic side to him, as if ashamed of what it had created/what he had become when he no longer had a conscience to hold him in check. He continues to hide from humanity as best he can, realising that he has no place in it nor in the demon world - to me it seemed that he took a look at what he was both as human and as a demon and couldn't find aything he liked about either incarnation - and he was scared to actually become anything in this new ensouled vamp version of himself. But on the one time (that we know about) he had to turn a human while he had a soul, we see that once again he's created something new.

tbc...

[identity profile] mbbthebest.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
I largely agree.

In relation to that, it made me wonder if Darla/Angelus would be proud if they knew how much their actions of killing Jesse and hurting Buffy influenced Xander's live while he was not even their target.

[identity profile] a2zmom.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
Just came from TWoP and you got sporked for that? There's a reason I don't hang there any more, the place is batshit crazy.

If intelligent discourse is no longer allowed what's the point?

(Anonymous) 2006-09-05 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
Compare Angel's history to that of Spike.

William as a human was the exact opposite of Spike as a vampire. Spike was everything William wanted to be (if you take the Liam-as-artist theory, then Angelus could technically be viewed as everything Liam wanted to be - in that his whole life and existance becomes about the art, and nothing and no-one will ever tell him how to live anymore - not even the Master). William was allowed to attempt to create his poetry, even though it was ridiculed by all that heard it. Spike simply lives for fun and entertainment; but maybe it shows something that as far as we see Spike never really Sires anyone (I'm sure that there's a fundamental difference between creating a Childe and creating the standard run of the mill minions that were seen each week).

The problem with addressing Souled-Spike vs non-Souled Spike is that we have the intermediate step, Chipped-Spike. Now I liked Chipped-Spike (that said, I'm by no means a Spike-fan, I've simply given him the level of thought I've given to all the characters), he was entertaining in all the right ways while still being true to his vampire self. He knew he couldn't survive on his own in that form, and he also knew that the Scoobs might be willing to take on a vampire that wasn't killing humans, and in a brilliant move of manipulation did *just* enough to keep them from killing him for a couple of years.

The problem is that once Spike gets a soul (I'm not going to get sidetracked with an argument about the reason why Spike got it - at least not in this post), there isn't much noticeable change in his behaviour from his time as Chipped-Spike. Guess what, Angel's first actions weren't that different from what he'd been doing before either... (and in a strange reversal of this, Darla needs to be looked at too - haven't got time and space to go into it here, but to me on her return as human, she seemed to be stuck in the mindset of a vampire - maybe the fact that she was terminally ill, and the fact that in her mind there was no human life to attempt to adopt/rejoin/revisit).

To me, Spike wasn't the finished version when the show(s) ended. And with there only being two years from when he got the soul to the show's cancellation, it would have been unrealistic for him to achieve it. However it should have been obvious that he was moving towards something, or at least simply moving. And that's where the show failed in regards to me with the souled-Spike storyline; I liked it when he turned up crazy, I liked that getting a soul was going to cause him serious issues... at the start of season 7, I believed we were going to see what getting a soul could have been like for Angel at the very beginning. I liked that as a concept, and in my mind it could have worked; whereas I can understand/explain what ME did (see above for my own theories on the Spike thing), I'd like it even more if I believed that's what they were *intending* to do (Souled-Spike as an unfinished project, slowly working his way into something that doesn't resemble either William or Spike or chipped-Spike), and as a result I end up hating what they did to the character Spike. The end of crazy Spike (oh look it was just the first playnig with him), was a giant failure to me. From that point on they simply built some ideal version of Spike that some of the writers liked (keeping his snarkiness, some version of his relationship with Buffy, etc), and tried to force him into some twisted version of a perfect male in which all other males have such obvious faults (on the BTVS show at least, on AtS it was better but they couldn't go down that route and keep any viewers from that show) - to me, that's the sort of choice that belongs in bad fanfic.

tbc...

(Anonymous) 2006-09-05 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
At the end of these mini-rants, I'm not sure exactly what I was trying to convey... maybe it's just some discussion points. But ME definitely seemed to act like some rabid fan about Spike/James Marsters... (instead of trying to come up with a way to make it work within the BTVS-verse rules), and even though I didn't like the final version of Spike I also agree with another point from above, either have characters you don't like leave town/not be in the current setting, or better yet, try (as I did in my own little mind, even though these particular theories never made it to any fics) and improve the characters to something you do like.

So there, in closing, (1) ME sold out when it came to Spike/James Marsters. (2) Don't bash characters you don't like, try to find something else to do with them even if it's just ignore them.

Mike C (not a Spike fan)

[identity profile] texanfan.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I am a Spike fan, and I agree with almost all you just said. Fascinating, deconstruction, BTW.

I've heard a compelling argument that Spike didn't really start growing into his soul until the incident with Dana in Damage. That little bit at the end with Angel was a very telling moment.

[identity profile] willowgreen.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
I've thought for some time that the behavior of the mods on TWOP is proof of the proposition that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[identity profile] szandara.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
So, you've been exiled from Wankville. Should I hand you a hankie, or a glass of champagne?

[identity profile] anelith.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
It's been a long time since I hung out at TWoP. Didn't realize it had gotten so uptight! The thing I don't understand (apart from how wanky and crazy it is now) is how they can prevent you or anyone from just reading the message threads. Sure, they can suspend you from posting, but *reading*?

I guess the technology is better than I thought.

Anyway, just stay here with us sane folk.

*cue maniacal laugh*

[identity profile] set-aka-ian.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
[quote] WHEEEEE! I've been suspended from TWoP completely. [/quote]

Congratulations! I've earned their ire a time or two for my 'snotty' comments. It's like a paddling that doesn't really hurt and you walk away laughing at the teacher.

[identity profile] singer-d.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
TWOP is one of the most poorly-moderated forums on the 'net. The mods are rude to the point of being abusive, and play favorites in such an obvious manner as to regularly give me headaches due to excessive eye-rolling. In any case you can probably read the board if you don't log in. I never registered and just lurk because of the crappy behavior of the mods.

[identity profile] texanfan.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it rude of me to say I think you're well out of that snake pit? Probably. I really don't like character bashing and I've come to the surprising realization in my own work that when I try to write characters I don't really care for fairly I find new depths and interest in them.

Boy are you right about the telling not showing in s7. Of course, they were way too busy taking James' shirt off to actually add any depth to his character. I got seriously tired of the "let's torture Spike some more" scenes instead of interactions with the other characters. Honestly, think about what he and Willow had to say to each other. Also, somewhere between Beneath You and Sleeper Xander did a practical 180 in his opinion on Spike. What happened? Did they talk? Bond? Did Spike do something that made Xander view him differently? I hated not having scenes like that.

There are arguments for Spike or Angel being better, but I think there are much more interesting ones for them being different. MAny of them are the reasons you already listed. I think still others can be found in their human religious backgrounds and family situations.

[identity profile] kaydee23.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Is TWoP Television Without Pity? They ban people there? I don't understand. So weird. :shrugs:]

I didn't much like Nick's movie either. I didn't even watch the second hour because they were all so annoying. Oh well.

[identity profile] mbbthebest.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
It's probebly banning on IP, which is logged with your SN or the moment you posted.
Had the same problem on theWB.com, it just displayed a white page (As no message was sent, it toke me weeks to realise it was not a problem with their server)

It can usually be accessed again with a combination of a different IP (phonemodem or proxy) and new sceenname

[identity profile] lusciousxander.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG, they banned you?! I've been giving a warning that won't go away, but being banned for that? I saw way more crap over there.

I'm trying to finish the Spike interview and most of my material is from there .. lol

Aw now I feel so bad regarding the NB/CC movie, I was looking forwards to it.

snottiness?

[identity profile] xxmagex.livejournal.com 2006-09-05 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
snottiness is a crime on TWOP?

Okay, Miss Manners is clearly out of control!

Make me glad I don't frequent TWOP,

[identity profile] taerowyn.livejournal.com 2006-09-06 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
OK, so I'm one (or two or three) glass(es) of wine too far in to disect your Spike analysis, but as far as the NB/CC reunion movie...somebody needs to explain to the writers at ABC Family the difference between anvils and foreshadowing cause, to quote TWoP, that thing was anvilicious...

[identity profile] faith-chaos.livejournal.com 2006-09-06 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
However, in stating the fact that Spike with soul is a different person than Spike without a soul, they most certainly weren't breaking canon on that front. They were being amazingly consistent, which is nothing short of a miracle in S7.

What's good for the Angel, is good for the Spike says I.


Word! S7 and continuity :shakes head: do not get along. Can you imagine what it was like being an old casual viewer who hadn’t seen the show since S3 to run into these people on mid S6-S7? I was like wtf happened here?!?!

I will note, however, that Spike’s character traits were far more consistent with/without soul than Angel/Angelus. The basic premise of a soul is the ability to make moral choices, and as much as I wanted to see it, I guess my basic lazyblahness referring Spike always made me see him as not quite that different on the outside, it was, me thinks, an inner change more than anything. Of course being able to make moral choices doesn’t mean one’s gonna do what’s right, so he does get some credit for [whatever his reasons may have been, read: (IMO) get in Buffy’s pants] doing the “right thing”. So maybe, with all of the S7 craziness, the writers were aware of this but couldn’t really develop it more, hence the “But he has a soul!” mantra. Am I making sense? Probably not, but I’m on a roll so I’m gonna keep going…

Not only that, Spike had a support network once he got it. Buffy — at least partially driven by her Angel issues— backed and supported Spike. The Scoobs, to varying degrees, fell in line for the most part.

For some weird ass reason, this: “driven by her Angel Issues”, made me laugh my ass off for close to five minutes. I’m sooo not kidding here, I almost fell of my chair. I think that the fact that Spike wanted a soul does make them different in the sense that Spike knew what he was getting into and [initial craziness aside] he had at least a vague idea of what was expecting him. I believe he counted on the Angel Issues [which I am totally capitalizing from now on] to help his cause with Buffy, and if he didn’t, well, he ain’t that smart.

Having said all that, Spike without the soul (just like Angelus before him) was an utter bastard.

Thanks for making that clear, I was sort of confused about the subject! [;)]

Whitewashing him and making the Scoobs look bad by comparison in fanfic...that just rubs the wrong way.

I tend to avoid Spike fics. I am probably missing on some great stuff [or so I’m told] but seriously, I don’t like the character that much and for some reason, other characters tend to get smashed a lot, so what’s the point anyway? This is what bashing does… it drives away people. I think it’s all about the alpha and how some people wanna turn their favorite characters into the alpha, regardless of who they actually are on the show and how OOC they can become.

I have to say though, that I dislike glorification of characters just as much as bashing. There’s a reason for me to have written my “Just Keep Waiting” fic, so I could get all of the “Faith is the shit, she rockz” feelings outta my system. Not sure I managed to do it completely, I kept enough so that she’s still the shit, only, with flaws too. Whatever. So, yeah, my point. These two things are kinda complementary, cause you know, glorification of the Spike does lead [not always, but a lot of times] to bashing of other characters [read: mostly Xander].

Faith.

[identity profile] mbbthebest.livejournal.com 2006-09-08 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
[i]However, I get why Spike's the number one fave for people. I understand it. It all comes down to what character appeals to/speaks to you. [/i]

I understand the liking of him as a character too, but I'm still clueless why so many like his personality.

But I'm beginning to get a suspicion on why the people liking him (post-S3) so often clash with other fans/shippers;
From S4/5 Spike got both the cool-strong guy-position Angel used to have as well as the underdog-possition of Xander, without the related negative issues as responsiblilety and uncertainty (no soul). So new viewers turning in after that season usually chose for Spike to relate too, whereas most would have split over Xander and Angel (or liked both) if they had started in S1.
(Are there any Xander-fans who first tuned in during mid-S4 or later?)

[i]I enjoy Spike-centric fanfic that doesn't take a crudgel to the other characters, or plays down the legitimate feelings of and between other characters just so he can look better by comparison. [/i]
LOL, I consider playing people to his own advantage part of Spikes skills/personality. But I agree, it should stick to the character, not to thew story.

And I've no problem with the existense of Bash=fics, as long as they are properly labeled, and only used for that particular goal, not to make others look better. (not sure how a character looks smart or Good if his rival is an Evil fool, but ok. :-)

Has anyone ever written a "Rules in the Art of Bashing" yet?

minim_calibre: (Alan Smithee)

[personal profile] minim_calibre 2006-09-12 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, I'm going to have to force myself to get over being intimdated by your brains and have to read you on a regular basis.

I think I just nodded my head until it fell onto my keyboard reading this.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2006-09-13 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay! I've friended you back.

As you can see, I actually don't do a lot by way of locked posts. I've done more than usual recently, but only because I'm working on a difficult piece of fanfic.