Entry tags:
How is bigotry good for business again?
Edit: Update below, news round-up.
******
When I think of gardners, I think of all the kind-hearted people on my Flist who take pictures of their fields and farms. True, I have the ultimate in brown thumbs, so I tend to skim the actual how-to posts, but pictures pretty!
What I generally don't think is "homophobic bigot" when I think of gardners.
As it turns out,
stoney321, a Master Gardner, today received a stunning email from the president of a gardening supply company with whom she had done business in the past.
Troy Hake, president of Outsidepride.com, sent out an email blast to all of his clients and customers (which he numbers in the tens of thousands) to express his ultimate horror: two primetime CBS television shows that he enjoys had the unmitigated gall to show same-sex couples sharing a moment of affection.
The shows in question? Cold Case and Without A Trace, two television series that regularly showcase human-on-human violence for our entertainment. Now granted, the focus of both shows is on the people who solve the crimes, and less so on the victims. However, both Cold Case and Without A Trace have no problems occassionaly sliding in elements of the main characters' personal lives, including their sex lives.
Don't get me wrong. I like both shows, and if I've got nothing better to do with my time, I'll sit down and watch them. Mostly I like trying to figure out the mystery part beacuse I honestly don't give a crap about the character stuff.
Yet it boggles my mind that the owner of a gardening company with a significant catalog business, upon seeing a male-male couple on Cold Case tentatively working their way toward a relationship, and upon seeing a female-female couple on Without A Trace share a kiss, has gotten his knickers in a twist. So much so, that he email blasted his entire customer base urging them to drown CBS in complaints about both shows.
See? This is what I don't get about homophobic bigots (aside from the fact that they keep insisting that they're not, as Mr. Hake does here). Show 'em a decapitated body on prime time, they don't blink. Show 'em two people of the same sex making moon eyes at each other, and they're clutching the ol' pearl necklace (yes...a joke that's in bad tast...sooooo don't care).
Think he kind of forgot that a certain percentage of his customer base just might be gay? And that a larger percentage of his customer base just might find his opinion a weeeeee bit offensive?
Or maybe he just doesn't care and won't mind the loss of current and future business.
Anyway, to read the full text of the email blast that
stoney321 got, as well as
stoney321's response, go here.
You can bet that when I get home tonight, I'll be sending an atta-boy to CBS. As for Mr. Hake, I'll have to think harder about my email. I want to be polite while making clear that I will work very hard to turn his his company's name into "mud" with all my gardening friends.
He's entitled to be a homophobic bigot, of course.
And I'm entitled to preventing money from ever reaching his pockets because he is a homophobic bigot. I have no compunctions about letting him know that I'll be doing just that.
******
News Round-Up or Why You Should Never Assume Everyone Agrees With You:
One customer actually gets an answer from the company and it pisses him off. (F-bombs are dropped.) I have to include this snippet, though, because it made me laugh:
Turns out, according to The Portland Mercury Blog, that it's a canned response that every customer is going to get. Considering how much publicity this is getting, no response might be a better option.
Best Week Ever actually has a piece on this email
The Consumerist, Shoppers Bite Back urges its readers to take action.
Cup of Coffee confirms they also got the email.
Gay Rights Watch has some fairly humorous commentary on the whole thing, not to mention a new Web design for Outside Pride. (WARNING! Image may be offensive for some.)
Here's something from the blog Good As You.
lisalamona got the same letter.
Loaded Orygun actually called Outside Pride to confirm that the email is legit
The Portland Mercury Blog has also picked up news about the email.
The Portland Metroblog has also picked up the sordid affair.
queer_rage has something to say as well.
When I think of gardners, I think of all the kind-hearted people on my Flist who take pictures of their fields and farms. True, I have the ultimate in brown thumbs, so I tend to skim the actual how-to posts, but pictures pretty!
What I generally don't think is "homophobic bigot" when I think of gardners.
As it turns out,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Troy Hake, president of Outsidepride.com, sent out an email blast to all of his clients and customers (which he numbers in the tens of thousands) to express his ultimate horror: two primetime CBS television shows that he enjoys had the unmitigated gall to show same-sex couples sharing a moment of affection.
The shows in question? Cold Case and Without A Trace, two television series that regularly showcase human-on-human violence for our entertainment. Now granted, the focus of both shows is on the people who solve the crimes, and less so on the victims. However, both Cold Case and Without A Trace have no problems occassionaly sliding in elements of the main characters' personal lives, including their sex lives.
Don't get me wrong. I like both shows, and if I've got nothing better to do with my time, I'll sit down and watch them. Mostly I like trying to figure out the mystery part beacuse I honestly don't give a crap about the character stuff.
Yet it boggles my mind that the owner of a gardening company with a significant catalog business, upon seeing a male-male couple on Cold Case tentatively working their way toward a relationship, and upon seeing a female-female couple on Without A Trace share a kiss, has gotten his knickers in a twist. So much so, that he email blasted his entire customer base urging them to drown CBS in complaints about both shows.
See? This is what I don't get about homophobic bigots (aside from the fact that they keep insisting that they're not, as Mr. Hake does here). Show 'em a decapitated body on prime time, they don't blink. Show 'em two people of the same sex making moon eyes at each other, and they're clutching the ol' pearl necklace (yes...a joke that's in bad tast...sooooo don't care).
Think he kind of forgot that a certain percentage of his customer base just might be gay? And that a larger percentage of his customer base just might find his opinion a weeeeee bit offensive?
Or maybe he just doesn't care and won't mind the loss of current and future business.
Anyway, to read the full text of the email blast that
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
You can bet that when I get home tonight, I'll be sending an atta-boy to CBS. As for Mr. Hake, I'll have to think harder about my email. I want to be polite while making clear that I will work very hard to turn his his company's name into "mud" with all my gardening friends.
He's entitled to be a homophobic bigot, of course.
And I'm entitled to preventing money from ever reaching his pockets because he is a homophobic bigot. I have no compunctions about letting him know that I'll be doing just that.
News Round-Up or Why You Should Never Assume Everyone Agrees With You:
One customer actually gets an answer from the company and it pisses him off. (F-bombs are dropped.) I have to include this snippet, though, because it made me laugh:
I know we won't be buying seeds from them anymore, and that's what it boils down to. The amount of business they lose or gain from this shit will determine their level of tolerance. Depending upon their profit and loss reports, they'll either fly a Christian flag or a Rainbow one. I visited their site just now to see if they were committed to their opinions enough to post it on their pages. Could find nothing at first. I searched their site for the word "gay". Found this: Gayfeather Thickspike. I'm sure it's a flower, though it would be a great name for a queer superhero, or maybe just a high-priced dildo.
Turns out, according to The Portland Mercury Blog, that it's a canned response that every customer is going to get. Considering how much publicity this is getting, no response might be a better option.
Best Week Ever actually has a piece on this email
The Consumerist, Shoppers Bite Back urges its readers to take action.
Cup of Coffee confirms they also got the email.
Gay Rights Watch has some fairly humorous commentary on the whole thing, not to mention a new Web design for Outside Pride. (WARNING! Image may be offensive for some.)
Here's something from the blog Good As You.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Loaded Orygun actually called Outside Pride to confirm that the email is legit
The Portland Mercury Blog has also picked up news about the email.
The Portland Metroblog has also picked up the sordid affair.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
no subject
I'd love to see what your response to him is, if you feel up to sharing.
no subject
But I will definitely update the post and give you a link.
no subject
no subject
no subject
So many ways, and yet none of them will make an impact on him. I just have to decide if I feel up to flinging myself at a brick wall today. I will send supportive feedback to CBS, even though I'm embarrassed to say I have never seen either show. I just don't watch much television. *shrug*
In my humble opinion, what makes this man a bigot isn't the fact he's morally opposed to homosexuality. He certainly has a right to that belief. What makes him a bigot is his demand that his virgin eyes be protected from ever being exposed to an opposing viewpoint as well as insisting that others join him in this misguided cause. That makes him a bigot.
no subject
Not only did he annoy his gay customers and the customers who don't agree with him, I imagine he probably annoyed customers who might agree with him in principle, but don't appreciate the fact that they got blasted with what is essentially a political screed when they signed on for a gardening newsletter.
He might pick up some new business as a result of this, but I can't imagine that it'll make up for the business he's going to lose as a result. Even though I (obviously) don't agree with his stance, why create such a deadly cocktail by mixing the two in such a way that people where not only shocked, but felt they got slapped when they read it because it was so unexpected? *shakes head*
What really confuzzles me, however, is the idea that Without a Trace and Cold Case is "family entertainment." They're crime dramas, and we're not talking Dragnet-style crime dramas with minimal blood and artfully posed bodies either. I think for me it's the mental disconnect. Given a choice between porn and snuff-like violence, I'd rather deal with porn.
Actually, I tend to avoid both in televised entertainment as a general rule. I think not-so-deep down inside I'm a prude. :-)
no subject
The man is an idiot as well as a bigot. There's no way this hasn't bitten him on the ass.
no subject
Remember the program on the Louds, years ago? Wonder what he'd have to say about that?
no subject
You can make a huge difference. Even if you only tell one person, who tells one person and so on, the subsequent ripple can be much more than imagined.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*And one more thing: Please stop with the "Adam and Steve" shit. How fucking 1970's Oral Roberts is that damn line? If you're going to be a homophobic prick (which you are), at least get some new ways to verbally abuse your brothers in Christ.*
Sure hope they weren't one of those seed catalog companies I sold seed for in Brownies...
no subject
Frankly, I'd be surprised if there weren't people who were pissed off that even agreed in principle with the guy. People agreed to get his company's newsletter because they expected gardening info, not politices. Some people are going to view it as a violation of company trust because of the screed.
Contact Mr. Hake directly
(Anonymous) 2006-08-10 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Contact Mr. Hake directly
thanks for the traffic!
And keep passing the word around on this nutbag!
TJ, Loaded O
Re: thanks for the traffic!
Thanks for doing some legwork on this and I hope some of the local Oregon people who clicked your way stick around.
no subject
no subject
Being a history nut is a good thing, especially these days.
I had seen rumblings that this email might've been a hoax, mostly because most people can't believe that a business own could be this stupid, so I thought it might be a good idea to provide some corroborating links to back up
that was the first thing I did
It's legit, absolutely.
no subject
If it weren't for the fact Stoney's done business with this company, I'd think it was a spoof - Outside Pride for pete's sake. If it weren't for the fact that Loaded Orygun called and received confirmation that yes the owner sent this out, I'd think the company had been hacked. I can't believe he thought it was a good idea to send this and a really can't believe the automated reply they're sending out.
o_O
no subject
I think perhaps CNN would like to hear about Outsidepride's little letter.
no subject
no subject
Again, thank you so much for getting all of these together--it's something I look forward to watching develop, and I hope that the exposure only continues to grow.
no subject
no subject
Sometimes I wonder if I should try writing about a straight hero in a conventional relationship, just as an exercise, then I see stuff like this and realise that the world desperately needs more queer heroes (and more heroes in inter-racial relationships, with queer friends that help them solve the mystery, just in case I ever find a plot for Susan and Taj).
Looks like the company is getting well slapped anyway.
no subject
no subject
Such a double standard we have. Harrison Ford or Michael Douglas hang out with their 20-something starlets, and everyone is like, 'Dude! Way to go! Score!' Meanwhile, my mom (59) dates a 26 year old and she gets evil looks and whispers of cradle-robbing.
She's 59. Not dead. Just because the people whispering about her have withered up and dried out sexually doesn't mean everyone has.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But at least it will be a *stylish* denial.
My favorite quote from the pissed-off dude mentioned above;
- I would have actually had some respect for you if you'd just said, "Hey, we don't like queers. They're going to Hell. And if you don't like our letter, buy your fucking seed somewhere else!". It takes a rare and special kind of person to be able to suck two dicks and make two guys happy ... most people have to pick one side or the other. -
Man, 'OUTside PRIDE' and they sell 'seed?' I woulda thought this was a joke, too...
no subject
By the way, that friend is a reporter for a trade magazine catering to the direct marketing industry. They have a section of the magazine devoted to the different ways that companies can and do use their email mailing lists. Less than a minute after I told my friend about this, he responded asking if he could forward my email to the head of that particular department.
I hope you don't mind if I forward a link to this post back to them, keeping them up to date, because I have a feeling they're going to be writing about this too...
no subject
[Unknown site tag] of Loaded Orygun actually called the company to confirm the email is legit (the link is above), so his blog here on LJ or at Loaded Oyrgun might be a good one for your reporter friend to talk to. :-)
Fixing the Unknown LJ tag of [info]torridjoe
yes, do
loadedorygun@gmail.com
An update
Thanks for the heads up and best of luck with everything. If you want me to keep you updated on this stuff, just let me know. I'm at phill.arensberg@gmail.com. You rock like Slayer. - Phill
no subject
As a native Oregonian (as well as a human being), I'm mortified. Please don't think we're all a bunch of homophobic idiots. I tried to e-mail the guy, but I got way to offensive and couldn't send. Thanks to all who are spreading the news and fighting the hate. Y'all give me hope for humanity.
no subject
Direct Quote from their Privacy Statement:
“We will never sell your email address, phone number, or any other information to a third party. We respect your privacy and the reason you placed your trust in our company by giving us your information. You information is simply used to process your order and update you if there is a problem with your order. You will never receive any other literature from us unless you place another order with our company. We will also not sell your addresses to any other companies.”
Second, third and fourth sentences are most interesting. Are there any possible legal implications? I know, far fetched, but since there was never a problem with orders, just a melt-down of human decency...this *IS* false advertising to the consumer, isn’t it? They are mendacious on their own website...they seem to be operating under false pretenses by going against their own policies, or abusing their power over personal information to push a political agenda. I know this is a private company, so they probably can, but maybe someone with some advanced legal limbo could bring this discrepancy to their attention? Maybe THAT is a way to reach them, to make it clear that not only they are abusing the trust of their customers, but playing with fire by doing so?
I wish I were a lawyer. If there was a cause that I feel worthy of taking up, THIS would be it. Could there be a case? Anyone?
I hope there will be a time when my two daughters can honestly say that they have never seen a plea like this, sent under the incorrect assumption that something like this is alright...that decency was the order of the day, and that hate like this was something they have never seen. That we can all love each other, and let others love as they wish.
I can't imagine them gaining any more customers because of these views, and I shudder at the possibility that THEY thought so. But stranger things have happened, and it frightens me.
Rebecca