liz_marcs: Jeff and Annie in Trobed's bathroom during Remedial Chaos Theory (Default)
liz_marcs ([personal profile] liz_marcs) wrote2005-12-14 10:27 am

This Is Why The Thief-in-Chief's Approval Rating Is 38%


They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

—Benjamin Franklin


Meant to post something on this when the story started breaking two days ago, but busy RL prevented me from doing so. Plus, [livejournal.com profile] twistedchick and AmericaBlog had posts on this and it kicked me in the ass.

Anyone else pissed as all hell about this bullshit?

I mean, what the hell people? When you've got Human Rights Groups in Bangledesh pointing out that your country has gone off the deep end civl rights-wise, you know that you've got problems. But, as the Bangledeshis point out in their article, our problems on this front translates to problems for civil rights groups the world over. If we can't stave off this government's fascistic tendencies with our vaunted Constitutional protections, they note that everyone else can consider themselves pretty much fucked.

What I want to know is, why the hell aren't we more up in arms that we're living under a government that is so terrified of dissent, they'd actually spy on Quakers? Where are the cries of outrage? Where are the protests? Why aren't we getting on the phone to our Congressional representatives right now and demanding an investigation into this shit?

Because domestic spying? Not cool. And no one throw the "sleeper cell" argument at me. Every single terrorist attack on this nation's soil, from our homegrown nutjobs to the nutjobs born overseas, could have been stopped if people in law enfocement used the tools they already had. Shortcuts were made somewhere along the way, warnings were ignored (Hello August 6, 2001 memo detailing that Al Quaeda planned to hijack airplanes and use them as missles), and, in short, the existing system broke down.

Spy on the citizenry? Not going to solve that problem.

But this is clear a case of intimidation. Don't believe me? Check out this list of people and organizations spied on by the DoD.

Because, really people, what the fuck?

Why have we not impeached this entire administration? And why are they still roaming around the streets when their asses should be in jail? Why aren't we shipping these jerks off to the Hague so they can be charged with crimes against humanity?

And before you say, "Don't blame that Vicious Drunk and his Cadre of Sychophants," I do very much blame the Clown Circus. Any Wop like me can tell you, fish rots from the head, and this crew is rotten to the core, from outing a CIA operative as part of a political smear campaign, to lying to the American people to get them to agree to an illegal war of aggression against a sovreign nation, to fighting against a resolution that would ban the use of torture (hell, just that fact that we're now openly using torture and not apologizing for it makes me nervous; and someone tell me when torture became a question), to secret CIA prisons, to abandoning its citizens who've seen their lives destroyed, and now to domestic spying.

We need these people gone and we need them gone now.

[identity profile] timeofchange.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, yeah.

[identity profile] stephanierb.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 04:06 pm (UTC)(link)

It's disturbing how many people will voluntarily relinquish their civil rights to feel secure. I remember people being interviewed in the wake of 9/11 about the soon-to-be passed Patriot Act and everyone was saying the same thing, how this is what we have to to catch these people. Without batting an eyelash, they were willing to scrap the freedoms for which thousands of people have sacrificed their lives. It's seriously depressing.

As for why Herr Dictator is still in the White House, your guess is as good as mine. Someone nicknamed him the teflon president and it seems to be true, he can get away with anything.

[identity profile] moire2.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I'm pissed as hell. I've tried communicating with legislators, and I know the people around me have also attempted to do this. It doesn't have an impact. Frankly, I don't know what to do.

Amen. sister!

[identity profile] lirm35m.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)

We need these people gone and we need them gone [YESTERDAY]!!!

[identity profile] yma2.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Fuck yeah! That's what almost everyone I know thinks too. But then we live in Britain... so we dont' count.
:sigh: It's not as if we don't have a Bush-Lap-Dog as our leader...
I suppose I shoud really be more vocal about this sort of thing myself. I'm ashamed I'm not. To be fair I get no news though, (No TV or radio for me, just the internet. Took me 3 days to find out about the flooding).

[identity profile] aceliwen.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know if this is apocryphal, but:

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents,
more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron." - Mencken

It may also have something to do with the way authority is constructed in the United States, but I'm sick of writing that paper.

Also, Fareed Zakaria's big theory is that the more democracy we have, the less likely we are to be constitutional liberals and thus, populists and assholes have a greater chance of being elected. Then the assholes will gut the government, not having understood or respected the principles of constitutional liberalism, and then we're all fucked. (But Zakaria puts it pretty-like.)

[identity profile] bastardsnow.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe the correct word here is "Holler!"

Or some such.

::shuffles off to fume::

[identity profile] texanfan.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not a fan of the Patriot Act. I think what has been done to keep us "safe" is dangerous and, in many case, just plain wrong. The problem is that after 9/11 there was this great hue and cry that "something must be done!" and so politicians (who's only real interest is reelection) did something. It didn't matter how outrageous, morally reprehensible or patently useless what they did was, they were doing something! As long as the American people are wiling to run around like frightened children and scream to Big Brother to protect them this will go on.

The problem is not the politicians. They are the same slime mold they've always been, Democrat or Republican it doesn't matter. They will do what it takes to secure their jobs and damn the consequences. Real change will only happen if the electorate is educated. If their heads are pulled out of the hole in the ground (possibly forcibly) and they are made to see the world they are allowing/promoting come to pass.

Ironically enough, this is supposed to be the job of the news. Unfortunately, the main concern of news (in all media) is ratings, and fear is good for ratings.

Have I gone completely cynical? Maybe. But I also believe the wheel turns and will come around again. We just have to be patient and try to keep things from going boom in the meantime.

[identity profile] smhwpf.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Word.

In terms of spying on domestic opposition groups, I have to say I think that's pretty much always happened, whatever the political colour of the government. It's certainly the case in Britain that MI5 would spy on groups like CND, even the Anti-Apartheid movement. My organisation, Campaign Against Arms Trade, was certainly infiltrated. We caught the bastard pretty much red-handed two years ago - he was our national campaigns co-ordinator. Now he was working for the arms industry, but we strongly suspect he was passing info to the police as well. Basically if you actively oppose the government on a matter that can remotely be described as "national security", you can expect to be spied on. I'm not saying this is remotely a good thing. But it's not peculiar to Bush & co.

As for torture, I too have been viewing the revelations that have been coming out with mounting horror; but as Naomi Klein points out in a recent article, US administrations have promoted wholesale torture in client states for decades. And the CIA practiced torture on a vast scale in Vietnam. What's new is just how brazen they're being about it. I do think that that is very, very scary in itself. But we should avoid the idea that every evil of US policy is an entirely new thing due to this uniquely corrupt and malignant gang of thugs (though such they undoubtedly are), and that all will be well once they are gone.

[identity profile] liz-marcs.livejournal.com 2005-12-14 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is why my link says, "now openly using torture and not apologizing for it." Sadly, like Ms. Klein, I'm well aware that the U.S. doesn't have the cleanest human rights record on the planet. I'm not saying that "as long as it stays under the rug, it's all good." By no means. Sponsoring torture by proxy in client states is really not much better. However, if anyone made the difinitive connection in the past, there would have been a show of contrition and heads would have rolled.

My issue: It's not only open, it's being screamed from sea to shining sea. Forget the overwhelming coverage in the EU (easily accessible thanks to this new-fangled thing called the Internets...). One of the links above is to PBS's Frontline which spells out exactly what we're doing in Iraq. This is, in fact, getting mainstream press coverage (not a lot, but enough). And the administration continues to lie with a completely straight face and is starting to move from denial to outright bragging, "Yeah, we do. So what?" That's the problem. It's out-and-out thuggishness.

As for domestic spying, this country did it during Vietnam and as a result, a lot of guidelines were put in place to prevent abuse. Obviously, no one wants to hogtie military intelligence. However, the DoD could only undertake domestic spying under very, very limited circumstances. As (I think) the MSNBC article makes note: even retired former domestic intelligence officers for the DoD are appalled at the recent revelations.

What has people up in arms is that we are fact descending back to Vietnam-era levels of domestic spying. Coupled with the Orwellian Patriot act, civil libertarians like myself are going ape about this.

But again, as long as the thugs are in power, don't expect apologies or for these domestic operations to slow down.

[identity profile] redrikki.livejournal.com 2005-12-15 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
While everyone keeps mentioning the Vietnam War era in relation to the Patriot Act and domestic spying, the historian in me is saying that we are actually pushing more into the Sedition Acts of WWI when it was illegal to publicly criticize the president, the government, any branch of the military, the Constitution and the war effort. If the military feels it has the right to spy on me for going to a peace rally where I stood around with a sign and listened to the names of the dead, then it's almost like being in 1917. Over time, our nation has gone through periods of scary politics and policies, and while on one hand that offers hope in our current crisis it's also damn depressing that Americans are too stupid to notice patterns and prevent them from reoccurring.

[identity profile] iyalode.livejournal.com 2005-12-15 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Lack of protest in my own country regarding issues similar to the US continues to flummox me. When did we become sheep? When did human decency, morality and basic human rights become a non-issue. How can we not be concerned and alarmed at the direction and actions of our govt?

Its there, on the news and available for anyone to see. But most us choose not to. I don't understand it. I can't.

[identity profile] midnightsjane.livejournal.com 2005-12-15 08:48 am (UTC)(link)
This is pretty scarey. I am very afraid that the US has given away any moral authority it may have had with this kind of activity. I have immense respect for the Americans I know who are standing up to the authorities who are trying to use fear and intimidation against their fellow citizens.
We're in the middle of a federal election here in Canada. Today the American ambassador to Canada was scolding the Prime Minister for daring to suggest, in a speech at the Kyoto accord meeting, that Mr. Bush should remember that there is such a thing as a global conscience. The ambassador basically told us that we should shut up and not speak out against anything the US government does, or face the consequences. Mr. Martin, to his credit, said he'd speak out as he felt necessary, thank you very much.
I sincerely hope that the American people come to their senses, and soon. Your country has so much to offer the world, and so many good qualities, that it's tragic to see it all going to hell.

[identity profile] mochi-tsuki.livejournal.com 2005-12-15 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
"Anyone else pissed as all hell about this bullshit?"

Oh yes. I just keep reminding myself of what Winston Churchill once said about democracy not guaranteeing good leadership, but protecting against the worst excesses of bad leadership (if anyone has the actual quote, I've been looking for it (in desultory fashion) for years). This is truly bad leadership, but I hold faith that we will, eventually, throw them out. Of course, I'm still in shock we didn't do it last year.

[identity profile] waleli.livejournal.com 2005-12-15 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm definately pissed off. What ever happened to our right to peaceful protests? I'm tired of the current administration, I never wanted them in to begin with. It's pretty bad when my best friend who is the most Right Wing Republican you can think of started out defending Bush tooth and nail when he was elected and now he just frowns and shakes his head and asks not to be grouped in with the current idiot President. I realize that most politicians are slime...but this President is a different kind of slime. He's lower than the organisms that feed off of the amoebas on slime. My only consolation is that he can't be President again...of course, by the time he gets out, he will have already fuggered up this country so much that I feel bad for what the next President will have to fix. Does anyone else suddenly miss Clinton?