*slightly hysterical scream*
Xander?
Dude?
Why are you doing this to me? Seriously.
I've got crap to do. I bills to pay. A budget to balance. A few quick looks around LJ (which turned out not to be so quick...man it's tough catching up...)
I managed to get it done, despite your whining.
I want to get up early tomorrow and pretend to go to the gym.
But you have dragged me back to the computer at 11:19 p.m. insisting that I keep writing.
Because "you want to get it over with."
Thanks a lot.
Hate you, too.
And thus, I prove that I have officially gone off the deep end. I'm not only arguing with imaginary people, I'm arguing with imaginary people that I don't even own.
My life isn't bizarre. Not. At. All.
Dude?
Why are you doing this to me? Seriously.
I've got crap to do. I bills to pay. A budget to balance. A few quick looks around LJ (which turned out not to be so quick...man it's tough catching up...)
I managed to get it done, despite your whining.
I want to get up early tomorrow and pretend to go to the gym.
But you have dragged me back to the computer at 11:19 p.m. insisting that I keep writing.
Because "you want to get it over with."
Thanks a lot.
Hate you, too.
And thus, I prove that I have officially gone off the deep end. I'm not only arguing with imaginary people, I'm arguing with imaginary people that I don't even own.
My life isn't bizarre. Not. At. All.

no subject
=)
no subject
yay.
no subject
no subject
YOUR TURN!
no subject
Heh. Celli regularly has conversations with Lex Luthor and Eric Weiss and others, but usually, they result in her hiding under her desk.
Me, I just feed the imaginary wolf more taco chips.
Hmmm... there's an idea.
Xander? Cheezy chip?
no subject
Bastard through the Twinkies back at me. He's got quite the pitcher's arm for a one-eyed guy.
no subject
What? The Scoobies aren't real? Nooooo!
no subject
It's one of those things: Xander agreed to be a Watcher, but he hasn't had to make any really hard decisions that go against his instincts for the greater good.
All through the canon, sure, he's had to make compromises by working with people he didn't like, but he's never been the one to make the decision nor did he ever have to do anything that he knew would keep him up nights. He's always been able to rationalize his decisions as "being for the best" in one form or another. This particular situation he won't be able to rationalize it beacuse it's a spur of the moment judgement call where he'll never be 100% sure he did the right thing.
It doesn't help that I've been heading for this situation for awhile, so I can't really back out of it now, even though I suspect I'm about to really piss some people off.
So, yeah, that's the source of the Xander-pokage. I'm not getting the usual fight with the character (or what I deem to be in-character in canon) that I'd usually get with something I know is going to have some people screaming bloody murder (like the case of Xander and Anya getting it on). It's sort of the whole "rip the bandaid off and get it over with" writing.
WWHD?
Re: WWHD?
Wine much better!
no subject
That should shut him up. :)
no subject
He pelted me with twinkies.
Ungrateful bastard.
no subject
You say this like arguing with imaginary people you do own would be somehow more sane.
Plus, how can someone "own" an imaginary person? The legal right to put out stories about that imaginary person? Sure, someone can own that. But there's no way that I'm going to let anyone tell me that they own my imaginary Buffy and that I can't have her do what I want.
Man, that sounded wrong, and a bit perverted, too. Totally not what I meant. Really. Shut up.
no subject
And Heee! Imaginary Buffy puppeteering!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2005-08-19 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)I think my concern would be that you seem to be "loosing" the argument with imaginary people you don't own.
Except, of course, in this case that is good because we get neat stuff to read.
no subject
The big thing I'm concerned about is that all of Xander's motivations are clear because, and I think this just might be the case, some people are going to be pissed when they read it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
In all seriousness, I did have an off-line email with the individual involved in that and she did apologize.
She realized that she may have been overstepping the bounds when she confused me with someone else, namely, someone else she'd been having problems with. When I pointed out that I didn't even know who she was, so I couldn't exactly be one of the people she was having problems with, she was pretty horrified.
Those rants were taken down.
So I give her a ton of credit for back off and walking way instead of digging herself in deeper.
On the other hand, I do feel kind of bad. She was completely reasonable about backing off, so maybe she really did feel like she was being picked on the case she was ranting about. Since I wasn't even involved, I can't say one way or the other.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject