>But I disagree violently with everything you’ve said here. And other equally intelligent people do as well.


As someone who agrees with Liz's basic point of view, lwbush has a point. The name-calling doesn't convince and will put some people off of reading some of your other, valid points ("alcoholic" for example; he's almost certainly not currently one, and the fact that he might have been one in the past is not really relevant).

Of course - it's Liz's journal, she can rant (or do whatever) if she wants to.