Well, you're still using the service, so you must not object to it enough to take your business elsewhere. As for me, like I said, I don't particularly miss that oh-so-precious ability to post links to kiddie porn. Also, I have a prehensile tail. Oh, wait, that's a lie! The horror! Now nothing I say will ever have any meaning, and I'm a horrible person who needs to leave the Internet forever and turn all my web real estate over to people who know how to run it properly and will let people link to all the content they want, because OMG HORRORZ LINKS IS NOT TEH CONTENT! Yeah, I get it. LJ lied, they're evil, they suck, let's all boycott them. Gotcha. Feel free to leave. I won't stop you. My point is that there are pros and cons, and people are really hitting the cons hard. It's like living in any city in the world. You operate under the assumption that, if you don't break the law, law enforcement will leave you alone. Well, sometimes they make mistakes. Sometimes they screw up. Sometimes they make laws you don't like, and don't follow their own guidelines for enforcing them. Are you going to pack up and move to make sure your precious tax dollars go to support a city that hasn't shown you the seedy corrupted side yet? Apparently, you will. Fair enough. I just think people are reading too much into this whole "we refuse to host links to objectionable content but don't police offsite content" thing... as if they haven't already done enough stupid things worth leaving over. Of course, this entire comment, as I've already mentioned, contains no content, as it's a single giant link. So I don't imagine you'll pay attention to it anyway. (www.anifics.com/hosted/nidoking)
This comment has no content