As other, more recent entries in the community explain, however, non-photographic content involving minors in sexual situations which does not contain serious artistic or literary merit is likely in violation of Federal obscenity laws, and is content LiveJournal has chosen not to host
was, as it says, spelled out pretty plainly in at least one and possibly more other places, by LJ/6A reps, before today/yesterday. Maybe people weren't fully grasping it, but I do believe it was there.
Not that I'm happy about any of this, because I'm not. :-(
no subject
As other, more recent entries in the community explain, however, non-photographic content involving minors in sexual situations which does not contain serious artistic or literary merit is likely in violation of Federal obscenity laws, and is content LiveJournal has chosen not to host
was, as it says, spelled out pretty plainly in at least one and possibly more other places, by LJ/6A reps, before today/yesterday. Maybe people weren't fully grasping it, but I do believe it was there.
Not that I'm happy about any of this, because I'm not. :-(