Hello. I've been trying to catch up and get a grasp on this situation. =)
It has occurred to me that since whomever appears to have gone to the advertisers who either use Google or Livejournal and used economic pressure (Warriors For Innocence or someone else) they are only a small group and possibly not connected with legitimate or legal basis for their claims. However - Livejournal is how many million members? Can you imagine how fast the reaction from advertisers / vendors would be if even a portion of Live Journal users actively expressed their displeasure at this apparent censorship without proper cause - in the form of a boycott? (even a potential implied boycott)
If this is advertiser / economically based this method might be the quickest and most pointed action that could be taken. That proverbial bottom line is very sensitive.
no subject
It has occurred to me that since whomever appears to have gone to the advertisers who either use Google or Livejournal and used economic pressure (Warriors For Innocence or someone else) they are only a small group and possibly not connected with legitimate or legal basis for their claims. However - Livejournal is how many million members? Can you imagine how fast the reaction from advertisers / vendors would be if even a portion of Live Journal users actively expressed their displeasure at this apparent censorship without proper cause - in the form of a boycott? (even a potential implied boycott)
If this is advertiser / economically based this method might be the quickest and most pointed action that could be taken. That proverbial bottom line is very sensitive.