Entry tags:
I, For One, Welcome Our Mooninite Overlords
VERY IMPORTANT ETA: The BPDNews, which is kind of an electronic feed that anyone can check into, makes note of the 1:02 p.m. simulated pipe bomb that was found in a desk draw at the New England Medical Center that occurred at the height of yesterday's chaos.
The simulated pipe bomb, while not a real pipe bomb, was a legitimate emergency situation, given that public safety people were spread out all over the city.
Once you read and absorb that piece of information, read the next few parts after that. It turns out there was a flurry of bomb threat calls into the Boston Police Department all right around that time. Some pointing to Lite Brites, but one pointing to the simulated pipe bomb found on the Longfellow Bridge.
More information in this post.
*****

The Lite Brite That Menaced Boston. Photo from Boston.com
The Head-Slapping: Turner Broadcasting
It appears that both Turner Broadcasting and Interference Inc., the New York City marketing firm they hired, failed to get permits or permission to place magnetized Lite Brites around the city. This is in sharp contrast to two other cities — Seattle and Philadelphia — where apparently they (or someone else) did go through the permitting process.
In my mind, if C&C Convenience Store on the corner needs a permit to put out a stationary sign in front of their store advertising a 2-for1 beer sale, then Turner and its subcontractors sure as hell have to do it, too.
Turner and the Cartoon Network have owned up, apologized, and (reading between the lines) there may be restitution for yesterday's massive fuck-up. Good for them.
The Annoying: Local Officials
In the middle of yesterday's War of the Worlds-style Wellesian freak-out, a lowly police analyst was the first to call shenanigans. Nice to know that someone in the city government watches Adult Swim. In any case, the police analyst, upon seeing the Lite Brites that had menaced the city, spoke up.
This was about 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Even before that, the police figured out they were Lite Brites when they noticed the things they removed lit up when they were taken out of the sun and into a darkened space.
Somewhere this time, the artist who placed the Lite Brites around the city came forward, copped to what he did, and told the cops where to find them all.
Now, considering that the local officials appear to have known hours before Turner Broadcasting called to let the police department know the Lite Brites were not bombs and released a public apology — Why the hell were they feeding hysteria?
No. Seriously. Between (let's be generous here) 2:30 p.m. and when the city of Boston officially called off the hunt for dangerous Lite Brites, city officials were issuing vaguely ominous statements, complete with dog-whistle phrases, instead of saying, "Whoa! Let's step back a little bit here."
The chest-thumping you heard last night? That was the dance of, "You made us look stupid. You gotta pay!"
The Infuriating and the Hopeful: Charging the Artist
The folks at
b0st0n staged a rally for Arlington artist Peter Berdovsky and Sean Stevens of Charlestown, pointing out that the guys were hired to do a job, and that they aren't responsible for the chaos that erupted in Boston (that was due to Turner Broadcasting and the local pols). If Turner or its marketing company failed to get the permits or win permission from the city, put the blame where it belongs. Don't put it on the artist, Ktnxbi.
Also something that I think should be taken into consideration, Berdovsky stepped forward and copped to it without any prompting from police. He has cooperated and done everything the police asked him to do. Dude! So much for being honest. If the state or city has any balls whatsoever, they'll drop all charges against Berdovski and Stevens because, of everyone in this mess, they're the only ones who are truly innocent here.
Good on
b0st0n for staging the protest this morning at the arraignment. Hope people are smart enough to listen.
For anyone who's interested in the whole sordid tale, check out the Boston Globe's online collection of the 2007 Boston Lite Brite Scare.

Sean Stevens (left), 28, and Peter Berdovsky, 27, today pleaded not guilty to disorderly conduct and placing a hoax device that caused panic. Photo from Boston.com
ETA: It appears that Berdovsky and Stevens are being held on $2,500 bail each, and both expect to post bail later today. The good news? The judge thinks the state's case sucks, especially since the artists were only doing the job they were hired to do.
Don't forget to download Alice's Restaurant (link up above in this post). If you feel like it, pass the link on to others on your FList. I only ask that you explain that it's to show virtual support for Berdovsky and Stevens if you do. Okay. Yeah. Not much of a protest on my part. I just think it would interesting to see how far this goes.
ETA2: As it turns out, city and state officials may have had legitimate reasons for their over-reaction.
The simulated pipe bomb, while not a real pipe bomb, was a legitimate emergency situation, given that public safety people were spread out all over the city.
Once you read and absorb that piece of information, read the next few parts after that. It turns out there was a flurry of bomb threat calls into the Boston Police Department all right around that time. Some pointing to Lite Brites, but one pointing to the simulated pipe bomb found on the Longfellow Bridge.
More information in this post.
The Lite Brite That Menaced Boston. Photo from Boston.com
The Head-Slapping: Turner Broadcasting
It appears that both Turner Broadcasting and Interference Inc., the New York City marketing firm they hired, failed to get permits or permission to place magnetized Lite Brites around the city. This is in sharp contrast to two other cities — Seattle and Philadelphia — where apparently they (or someone else) did go through the permitting process.
In my mind, if C&C Convenience Store on the corner needs a permit to put out a stationary sign in front of their store advertising a 2-for1 beer sale, then Turner and its subcontractors sure as hell have to do it, too.
Turner and the Cartoon Network have owned up, apologized, and (reading between the lines) there may be restitution for yesterday's massive fuck-up. Good for them.
The Annoying: Local Officials
In the middle of yesterday's War of the Worlds-style Wellesian freak-out, a lowly police analyst was the first to call shenanigans. Nice to know that someone in the city government watches Adult Swim. In any case, the police analyst, upon seeing the Lite Brites that had menaced the city, spoke up.
This was about 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Even before that, the police figured out they were Lite Brites when they noticed the things they removed lit up when they were taken out of the sun and into a darkened space.
Somewhere this time, the artist who placed the Lite Brites around the city came forward, copped to what he did, and told the cops where to find them all.
Now, considering that the local officials appear to have known hours before Turner Broadcasting called to let the police department know the Lite Brites were not bombs and released a public apology — Why the hell were they feeding hysteria?
No. Seriously. Between (let's be generous here) 2:30 p.m. and when the city of Boston officially called off the hunt for dangerous Lite Brites, city officials were issuing vaguely ominous statements, complete with dog-whistle phrases, instead of saying, "Whoa! Let's step back a little bit here."
The chest-thumping you heard last night? That was the dance of, "You made us look stupid. You gotta pay!"
The Infuriating and the Hopeful: Charging the Artist
The folks at
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Also something that I think should be taken into consideration, Berdovsky stepped forward and copped to it without any prompting from police. He has cooperated and done everything the police asked him to do. Dude! So much for being honest. If the state or city has any balls whatsoever, they'll drop all charges against Berdovski and Stevens because, of everyone in this mess, they're the only ones who are truly innocent here.
Good on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
For anyone who's interested in the whole sordid tale, check out the Boston Globe's online collection of the 2007 Boston Lite Brite Scare.
Sean Stevens (left), 28, and Peter Berdovsky, 27, today pleaded not guilty to disorderly conduct and placing a hoax device that caused panic. Photo from Boston.com
ETA: It appears that Berdovsky and Stevens are being held on $2,500 bail each, and both expect to post bail later today. The good news? The judge thinks the state's case sucks, especially since the artists were only doing the job they were hired to do.
Don't forget to download Alice's Restaurant (link up above in this post). If you feel like it, pass the link on to others on your FList. I only ask that you explain that it's to show virtual support for Berdovsky and Stevens if you do. Okay. Yeah. Not much of a protest on my part. I just think it would interesting to see how far this goes.
ETA2: As it turns out, city and state officials may have had legitimate reasons for their over-reaction.
no subject
I have no words.
no subject
Also...
(Anonymous) 2007-02-01 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)Also...
(Anonymous) 2007-02-01 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)http://cgi.ebay.com/Mooninites-Ignignokt-LED-Advertising-Bomb_W0QQitemZ130075321405QQihZ003QQcategoryZ363QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting
$5,000! Crazy! Now I bet there's a treasure hunt going on in all the other cities.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Off topic, but they have a Music Factory that's pretty decent.
Everybody
totally freak out over lite britesdance now!(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
But they *could* have been bombs...
I'm dismayed at the people who are mocking/criticizing city officials for treating the devices as suspicious just because they were decorated with a picture of a cartoon character. (City officials made a lot of mistakes yesterday, but IMHO that wasn't one of them.) These mockers/critics imply that anyone should be able to tell the difference between a real bomb and a fake one. I strongly disagree with that assumption. This incident shows that most people are likely to assume that such devices are not dangerous -- which is a dangerous assumption in itself.
The "Lite Brites" weren't bombs, but they could have been -- or they could have been disguises for containers of poison gas or airborne bacteria (I know, it's unlikely, but it's not impossible). The outside decoration is irrelevant -- what's relevant in this case is that devices with batteries and wires were placed on the underside of bridges leading in and out of the city.
I agree with
In my opinion, it was completely appropriate to consider them suspicious and possibly bombs. I'm glad they were treated as suspicious! I'm sorry that so many people were inconvenienced, but the blame lies mostly on the shoulders of the suits at Turner Broadcasting who had the incredibly poor judgment to authorize such a wrongheaded marketing stunt.
I also question the judgment of any official in any city who would allow anyone to attach things that could be mistaken for bombs/terrorist weapons to public structures like bridges, regardless of their intent. (Side thought: And why is commercial advertising being allowed on public/government structures, anyway? I thought there was a law against that. There must be, otherwise every bridge would be covered with ads!)
Re: But they *could* have been bombs...
Re: But they *could* have been bombs...
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-02-01 18:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Julia, not to mention whoopy cushions
no subject
But as to the contents of your post, I find it rather horrifying that it seems like everyone seems to be fear mongering the populace and when it's shown to be a misjudgment, the blame is scapegoated onto those that actually did preform their job competently like the artists or the woman who noticed the signs.
You said in last night's post, there should be a Democrat asking if you really feel more safe than you did four years ago. I don't know if we're more safe than we were four years ago because When everyone and their mother trying to make people afraid of everything, the subjective answer of "Yes, I feel less safe." would take presence over whether or not in reality of you're more likely to be blown up by a bomb on your way to work tomorrow. We could in reality be far more safe now than we were before just for the fact that those who would like to kill "the infidels" are too busy taking advantage of the chaos in the Middle East at the moment to really bother making workable plans that could be carried out elsewhere.
eh...
(Anonymous) 2007-02-01 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Totally agree that it isn't the artists fault. I do have to wonder why Turner thought this would be a good advertising gimick in this day and age.
And it is interesting that no one noticed for two weeks. That's kind of scary too.
no subject
no subject
I apologize for my uninformed twitters. Pipe bombs (even fake ones) are far more menacing than Lite Brites.