What bugs me about Cricton's stance on *humanity's effect on* global warming is that while his point *is* valid about the science being underwhelming, he has to act like a whackjob about it and completely invalidate the facts behind the position.
But his being named 'worst person ever' gives me all sorts of gigglies. He gets cool points for that.
no subject
But his being named 'worst person ever' gives me all sorts of gigglies. He gets cool points for that.